« * "raise your hopeful voice, you have a choice...." | Main | * an Obama addendum.... » * "starin' thru the windshield, seein' the other side...."
I think I just figured out a way to sum up how I feel about the use of songs in TV commercials, which is a subject I've touched upon a few times in this space. This little epiphany came to me when dropping a line to my longtime friend Pete Droge after hearing his recent song "Going Whichever Way The Wind Blows" in an automobile ad a couple times this week. It's a nice fit: The ad shows folks camping out at night in the desert, Droge's song sounding a bit like the soundtrack to the starry sky floating above them. I sent Pete a quick note saying I'd seen it, then thought maybe I should've also mentioned half-jokingly that I couldn't even remember what car it was for, but that it didn't really matter because I just consider the spot to be an ad for the song, rather than the other way around. And that's it, in a nutshell. If, as an artist, you can justify the footage accompanying your ad as making a reasonable connection with the song's spirit, then it works for everyone involved. Thus my positive reaction to Droge's song in the car ad. And to Hem's songs in recent Liberty Mutual commercials, which feature sequential shots of people lending a helping hand to each other on the street, one act of kindness following another. And it's why the car ad that used Nick Drake's "Pink Moon" a few years ago remains the best marriage of song and commercial ever -- because that spot captured Drake's vibe so well, it practically could have been an actual video for the song. By contrast, it's why John Mellencamp's "This Is Our Country" for trucks is a failure -- because nothing about the song connects with behemoth pickups tramping around the landscape. And it's why the Weepies' "Stars" fails as a spot for a cable movie channel, because the song has absolutely nothing to do with movie stars. Ultimately, it matters very little what the product is; any company that can afford to produce major TV commercials is almost certain to be a gigantic entity that has both positive and negative aspects to its corporate philosophy. Forget the product, though, and flip it around -- if the visual element works as an ad for the song, then it's not just good pocketbook, it's also respectable art. adios, ** A quick update to this entry: I noticed I'd embedded videos on the three entries that followed this one, so it seems fitting to also post the video I refer to above. Here it is, if you're interested: Posted by peter on January 24, 2008 8:49 AM | Permalink |
Recent Posts * "a full cup of coffee, a full tank of gas, an open road and a real good idea is all you'll ever need." Archives June 2008
May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 December 2006 September 2006 June 2006 May 2006 February 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 Search This Blog |
Comments
This is right on. I've long grown tired of people complaining about their fave band allowing it's music to be used in commercials. It serves the same way radio does these days. It advertises a good song as much as it does a product, and much as you discovered, sometimes the song is what is sold, and not the product! You make a great point, however, about the significance between the song and the image on the screen. When it doesnt blend well, it just fails on all angles...
Posted by: Neil | February 7, 2008 11:36 AM